ASPECTS
OF LAKE CRAFT
I
was
recently at my home on the shores of Lake
Jindabyne the wind was up and blowing from the north east at about 20
Klm, it
was cold and overcast and there were intermittent snow and sleet
showers. All
in all it was a miserable day and better suited to tying flies, reading
or
writing than actually fishing. For some time I had been contemplating
putting some thoughts on paper about “lake craft” and that was what I
decided to
do. I
have a relatively short attention span and so after a couple of hours I
needed
a break. I knew that a couple of mates, Ill call them Leo and Chris,
were down
from Wollongong with their families and with the wife's encouragement I
phoned
them to invite them across for a bit of a natter and a cup of tea. When
I
phoned they weren't there they were off fishing. I made a mental note
to call
them later to see how they had gone, had a cup of tea with Julie and
went back
to this article. I thought about them a couple of times during the
afternoon
and my vision was of a couple of really cold blokes fishing into the
wind and
the structure at our end of the lake – but probably catching fish.
Later that
evening I phoned them and found out that their comfort had got the
better of
them and rather than fish into the wind they had moved to an almost
land locked bay at the protected
end of
the lake with the wind at their backs.
Unfortunately they hadn't had a touch even though as Leo
described it
they had been able to get out of the wind into some tolerable
conditions and
some really fishy looking water. I told
Leo that it was ironic that what he had done in choosing his protected
yet
fishy looking location was exactly the sort of compromise that trout
make and I
had spent the afternoon writing about.
On closer
observation some forms of structure are quite obvious and
their
identification can provide a starting point for the search for the
elusive
trout. The structure that we look for provides environments for two
basic forms
of things that trout eat. The first is
those food items that spend all or part of
their life cycle in the water such as nymphs and their subsequent
emergers and
duns of various insects including in the case of lakes mainly mayfly,
damselfly
and caddisfly, crustaceans such as yabbies, scud and daphnia, small
fish such
as smaller trout and tadpoles (and frogs if the water level doesn't
recede
before the eggs hatch), snails and carixia. The relevant structure for
these “aquatic” forms of trout food
is by in
large the fixed structure below the surface of the water. The second
form of things that trout eat is the
terrestrial insects including grasshoppers, beetles, and cicadas etc.
that find
themselves in or on the water for one reason or another. These
terrestrial
insects are of course more prevalent during summer months and their
presence is
related predominately to structure such as vegetation and topography
above the
surface of the water. The
types of
obvious or relatively obvious structure that
relates to these aquatic and terrestrial sources of trout food includes
weed
beds, rocky undulations, drop offs, drowned timber, mud beds where
yabbies
live, pockets of detritus matter where some nymphs live, sandy shore
lines
where some caddis live and of course the nature of the bank itself and
adjacent
vegetation. These of course are pretty easy to determine and except for
changes
caused by significant weather conditions or changes in water depth they
will
always be in the same position. If fixed structure is not visible then
you can
either identify it with the aid of a sounder or by word of mouth from
somebody
that knows the area better than you. If all else fails you can make
some
educated guesses based on your previous experience. That is to say that
for
example weed beds are generally in similar depths of water and in
similar
terrain. The same applies to rocky undulations. If it's rocky along the
shore
or there are large boulders along the shore in all probability similar
terrain
will apply to adjacent waters. Also there is a lot to be said for
searching
these areas out for your self. If time permits its nice to develop your
very
own range of likely locations based on experiences built up over
successive
fishing outings. In any case once you have determined the locations you
will be
well on your way to locating suitable habitats for the things that
trout eat
and hopefully trout themselves. Having said that there is a lot of
water mixed
with the fish and just because you have found the structure doesn't
mean you
have found fish. Trout
are
very economical with their energy and their
preference is to expend as little energy as possibly whilst maintaining
their
nourishment and comfort. To accommodate this trout either establish
territories
or beats in areas where there is a good supply of food and access to
comfortable holding zones or move around in the search of
concentrations of
food and or comfort. The trout
that establish territories or beats are
generally brown trout and just as in rivers a hierarchical system
prevails. The
largest fish takes the best positions and smaller fish frequent lesser
positions or move around looking for food and comfort. This is the same
as in
streams where the biggest fish take up station in the better positions,
places
where in relative terms a large amount of food passes and where they
can hold
without expending too much energy. Whilst we often refer to trout that
have
established territories or beats as resident fish it should be noted
that they
do move out of those positions and back to comfort zones at different
times. So
whilst finding structure may be like turning a light on in terms of
expectation remember that there may not be anyone home. The trout
that move around over large areas in search of
food are brown trout from down the hierarchical pecking order and of
course
most of the rainbow trout. These itinerant trout move around the lake
or
impoundment and resident fish retreat from their territories or beats
as a
result of a number of influences. To increase your chance of finding
trout it's
important to understand what those influences are and to make
allowances for
them. The
most
obvious influence I'm thinking about here is wind direction and
intensity. I like to think of wind as a very variable form of
structure. As
well as blowing food onto the water surface wind creates both surface
and
sub-surface currents and those currents dictate where food will be
concentrated,
to some extent where the comfort zone of the trout will be, and
consequently where fish are likely to be. The more wind the more
chance
there is of true terrestrials such as Beetles and Grass Hoppers being
blown
onto the water and of course the stronger both the surface and
sub-surface
currents will be. There is however a range of winds that
its
comfortable for fly fishing and I generally draw the line at winds
above about
25 Klm. Beyond that it is just plain uncomfortable and difficult to
fish and
unless everything goes right you can find yourself in more trouble than
Ned
Kelly. You can of course seek out wind protected areas such as the lee
of
islands and protected bays but you should keep in mind that its likely
the fish
will be where the wind is because it's channeling food in one form or
another
into concentrated pockets. Any way its all a compromise. Rather than
seeking
out those sheltered bays one choice is to get the wind at your back and
revert
to "short lining". The British developed this technique to deal
with fishing windblown Scottish Lochs. It involves modifying your
casting
technique by starting with a short false cast with the wind and then a
back
cast and final forward cast as a contiguous sweeping arc-like motion
which
allows the wind to safely get your fly or flies into position albeit
closer to
you than perhaps would be the case on a calmer day with a normal cast.
In windy
conditions being close to your target isn't as much as a problem as on
calmer
days because the turbulence on the water caused by the wind provides
some
visual protection. The offset of course is that if your too close to
where your
fishing you may spook fish. Fishing with the wind to your back does of
course
mean that any food that is being carried by wind and water currents
will be
quickly moving away from you. So its not always as easy as just finding
the
fixed structure to find fish. Whilst finding structure may be a good
starting
point there may be reasons why the fish are just not where you expect
them to
be. If there is no wind or little wind, as a minimum you may find that the food which trout feed on is widely dispersed and not concentrated in pockets and lanes and consequently the trout are widely dispersed also. Worse still, except for the few resident fish that I have already mentioned the balance of the population of fish may not be there at all. The itinerant trout may still be where they were feeding when the wind dropped off. For example, if prior to the wind dropping off it was blowing away from the structure you have found it's possible that the only fish that will be there are the few residents I mentioned earlier. Many of the other fish could quite easily be on the opposite side of the bay or lake cruising structure in that area either mopping up food that was blown there with the wind before it dropped or waiting for the wind to come back up and give them some expectation of where food will next concentrate. Wind lanes are an extreme example of influence of wind. They are an extremely variable form of structure and occur when the wind is split by some structure only to reform a some later point or where wind from slightly different directions converge. They can prevail for extended periods of time or may appear out of the blue and then disappear just as quickly. When they prevail they concentrate food into the area of convergence. At the same time the convergence also interferes with the prevailing surface effect of the prevailing wind on the surface of the water and creates flat spots and hopefully flat lanes of water that hold more food than the surrounding water that are easy for the fly fisher to see. The best wind lanes to fish are those that are long and thin and the best practice is to drift down either side of the wind lane and fish along the edge where it joins the main body of water. It should also be mentioned that the converging wind effect is not only on the surface of the water and often extends for several meters below the surface Fish are cognizant of the fact that converging wind increases the food supply in that area and generally travel up a wind lane toward the prevailing wind eating what they can either of the surface or in the wedge of water below the wind lane. There
are
other reasons why trout may not be where you
expect them to be. That's where the irony of my discussion with Leo
comes in.
Trout, just like Leo and Chris have physical needs other than food and
those
physical needs often dictate where the trout will be notwithstanding
that it
will put them well away from both the fixed and variable structure
mentioned
above. Whilst trout can tolerate a fairly broad range of temperatures
and
dissolved oxygen generally they are more comfortable in water
temperatures of
around 14 to 18 degrees Celsius and as a consequence spend most of
their time
in
water around that temperature range if they have a choice. In lakes
they do
have a
choice because the water stratifies into three distinct horizontal
layers and
maintaining contact with their comfort zone can often put them away
from where
you would otherwise expect them to be.
In
summer the layers are quite distinct. There is
generally a warmer “epilimnion” or top layer, a middle layer or
“thermocline”
and below that a layer at the bottom of the body of water called the
“hypolimnion”. Both the top layer and the thermocline have adequate
oxygen
levels for trout but the bottom colder level does not. So in summer
trout often
retreat to the thermocline which is a comfort zone providing both the
best
temperature and adequate oxygen content. Whilst in the thermocline
there may
also be supplies of food because daphnia, which are a small crustacean,
also
swan in large numbers in the thermocline. When there is an absence of
daphnia trout
will of course leave the thermocline comfort zone to feed but of course
will
favour feeding areas which are easily accessed from those comfort
zones. This
is why in summer the best fishing is often in water adjacent to deep
drop offs
or at dawn and dusk when water temperatures are a little lower and its
often
only during the cool of the night that trout venture into the shallower
bays.
As water heats up during the hotter parts of the day it becomes
deoxygenated
and trout often retreat to the cooler better oxygenated water
temperature of
the thermocline. Having
said that it should also be
understood that as water temperature becomes hotter trout
become more
active and need more nourishment. So in summer whilst trout prefer the
relative comfort of the thermocline they will leave it particularly at
dawn and dusk to forage for food in less comfortable zones but from
time to time they will return to their comfort zone.
There
are
however times when the comfort of the thermocline is pushed to the
surface creating situations where there is prolonged surface and
sub-surface feeding activity. This occurs on windier
days when there is a lot of water movement
caused by wind created currents, colder water can be pushed to the
surface by
those currents. This wind sheer effect as it is called can result in
the
comfort zone for trout being extended to the surface allowing the trout
to feed
in what then becomes a well originated and relatively comfortable
temperature
surface zone for longer periods than would otherwise be the case. Often
the
wind sheer is on the lee side of a bay and this partially explains why
there
are often more fish on the surface during windy days than on calm
days. This benefit of the wind shear is never on the protected
side of the bay and in fact the thermocline there is often pushed
deeper than it was before the wind came up. Keep in mind however that
this effect is restricted to areas where there are large volumes of
deep water and where the thermocline extends from shore to shore. This
means that if you are seeking a sheltered location to fish on
windy days you will benefit from fishing a protected bank in a large
deep bay but you are unlikely to benefit from the benefits of wind
sheer if you choose a less deep area protected from the main body of
water by say a headland or point.
There are
a number of other
weather factors you should also consider. Barometric pressure is
important as
can be cloud coverage.
Steve Brown’s stressed: § The importance of maintaining a record of all details of a days’ fishing but most importantly a as an on water compiled record of fish hooked, missed, and landed. This record is a tangible measure of angling improvement and or deficiencies.
§ The “world fly fishing championships” would be won not on the number of fish hooked, but on reducing the losses and the % fish actually netted as important!
§ The importance of maintaining contact between the fish, the fly and the angler. (see below)
§ Each fish throughout practice was to be netted as this is a skill that is generally neglected. § The flies for the competition are uncomplicated in design but MOST importantly must vary in density and weight. The chosen rivers have a significant push of water and thus there is a difficulty in penetrating this water and ensuring the full depth of the water is fished.
In summary Steve stressed that the team practice competitive angling and avoid the just going fishing mentality!
MAINTAINING CONTACT · A large % of takes particularly by smaller but counting fish occurred early in the drift and often as soon as the flies hit the water! · Slackness in leader causes significant losses · Additionally he recommended a flick strike of the wrist as important to convert these early takes. · This strike should always be sideways rather than upwards as it creates stronger and earlier contact. Having laid the line out upstream he encouraged fishing short with minimal line on the water! It was astonishing how close you could fish and be successful! With appropriate application and correct set up for deep nymphing - the line will travel through the water at a speed less than the superficial current and reflecting the laminar flow of the water adjacent to the river bed. The” bomb” must caress the river bed. The team as a group found that when deep nymphing, leading the line through the water slightly faster than the drift of the bomb enhanced ones appreciation of the strike and importantly guaranteed that the line was ahead of the bomb. Any visible slackness or looping of the subsurface line indicated poor technique with a loss of contact.
LEADER The team trialled a number of variations of this leader and generally and uniformly agreed that the use of a coloured level leader provided optimal visualisation of the strike. I think it’s fair to say that at the end of the New Zealand trip we favoured segments of differing colour, but in general principle were in favour of the 6 feet of colour attached to the 6 foot leader. Continued development of the leader is required.
TECHNIQUES · Czech Nymphing
·
Nymph under dry · Down and across with wee wets, o Size 14 o In black, brown and (fluoro orange in the middle.) o Particularly on a DI7.
· Fishing the block hole – a term used by Steve to describe the large area of confused eddy / backwater/no flow behind large boulders and obstructions. He described the imagery of casting into the block hole with no or little line on the water and mentally calculating, the descent of the flies through the block hole- striking is sixth sense!.
· Dry Fly particularly in the runs heavily weeded sections, between the weed columns. With all techniques it is stressed the importance of straightening the line immediately after casting to maintain contact. “STEVE’S SIGNIFICANT OTHER” ISSUES:
SUN ON THE WATER: In summary Do not fish in shadows NETTING Where possible – the length of leader from the top ferrule should match the amount that when lifted will allow the fish to immediately be dispatched into the net. Netting smaller fish from a longer line causes significant losses particularly if the fish surfaces prior to netting. It was suggested and confirmed by the team that in this situation the rod should be laid low and parallel to the water surface and the fish gently drawn up until the correct length of leader has been achieved for the lift and netting procedure. Larger fish: allowing these fish in the heavy water to get below the angler inevitably results in a significant loss rate. Rather than netting a preferred approach in the future may be banking and then netting! Fishing short reduces losses and optimises netting time!
CAMOUFLAGE:
CHANGING TACTICS
WADING Wading as defined by “Steve” is the opportunity to position oneself in the optimum position such that the delivery of the flies at the first cast will achieve success. This is contrary to our natural tendency which is to fish and wade up to the hot spot. It was demonstrated repeatedly that positioning oneself adjacent to the hot spot brought immediate success with the first cast, and indeed due to the high numbers of fish in the water from this position, numerous fish could, would and were caught. It was surprising how close anglers could wade to the fish and achieve success. This was dependant, however, on adopting a stealth approach, and using available camouflage.
STRIKING 1. The obvious: Leader suggested a fish and the end of each drift
2. But also encouraged: At the time with a sixth sense that an angler has when the nymphs progress over a drop-off into deeper water Striking in this manner demands good line control, contact with the flies, and use of a free hand to manage the line. In the lakes Steve recommended a double strike to ensure hook set.
|
||||
|